How it compares to Figma's own Chrome extension, and when to use each one

Figma just shipped its own HTML-to-Figma Chrome extension. Here's what that means if you're already using one.
If you've been following Webinspoo, you know I built a free Chrome extension that captures any live webpage and drops it into Figma as fully editable layers — not a flattened screenshot. A few weeks ago, Figma quietly shipped their own version of the same idea, built right into the product.
I've been getting asked some version of "so is your extension still worth using?" enough times that it's easier to just write it out.
What Figma's native extension does
It's a first-party Chrome extension. You capture a webpage or a single element, and it lands on your canvas as structured layers instead of an image. The three use cases Figma pitches are: kick off a new design from something already live, remix an existing page into a new direction, and feed a capture straight into Figma Make to prototype on top of it.
It's tightly wired into the rest of Figma. If your workflow already lives inside Figma Make or Dev Mode handoff, that native integration is genuinely convenient.
Where I think Webinspoo's extension still earns a place in your toolbar
I didn't build this as a general-purpose utility. I built it as the natural next step after Webinspoo itself you're already browsing a gallery of well-designed SaaS sites for inspiration, so the obvious missing piece was: what if you could pull the one you're looking at straight into Figma and start working on top of it, instead of screenshotting it like an animal.
A few things I care about that shaped how it works:
Quick login, no paid tier hiding basic functionality. A lot of the HTML-to-Figma tools I looked at while building this gate things like private-page capture or higher-fidelity rendering behind a subscription. Mine doesn't have one.
Same core promise as Figma's own tool text stays text, boxes stay boxes, everything's editable, not a raster image you're tracing over.
Honest take on when to use which
If you're deep in the Figma ecosystem already Figma Make, enterprise workspace, Dev Mode Figma's own extension is the lower-friction choice, because everything stays first-party and there's nothing extra to install.
If you're doing competitive research, redesign work, or just collecting real product inspiration and want the shortest possible loop from "I like this site" to "I'm now editing it in my file" that's exactly the loop Webinspoo's extension was built around.
And if you specifically don't want to hit a paywall the moment you try to capture a private page or use any AI-assisted import worth actually checking what's free vs. gated on whichever tool you land on. "Free extension" quietly means different things across this category right now.
The bigger thing I take from this
HTML-to-Figma has turned into a genuinely crowded space in the last year or two — Figma's own tool, html.to.design, Codia, Web to Figma, a handful of others, and now mine. That's not a bad sign. It means "redesign from the live site instead of a screenshot" has gone from a clever plugin trick to something considered basic tooling. Good for anyone doing this kind of work daily.
If you haven't tried this workflow yet, worth testing two or three of these on the same page. Capture fidelity how cleanly text, spacing, and components translate —still varies more than any of the landing pages let on.
Link to try mine: webinspoo.com/html-to-figma-extension free, quick login to get started.
Would genuinely love to hear which one people land on and why.
0
0
0