Tushar Vaghela

Apr 18, 2025 • 2 min read

🤔 Why 10 Developers Won’t Finish in 1 Day What 1 Developer Can Do in 10

🤔 Why 10 Developers Won’t Finish in 1 Day What 1 Developer Can Do in 10

There’s a classic misconception in software development:

“If 1 developer can finish a task in 10 days, then 10 developers should finish it in 1 day.”

Sounds logical, right? Unfortunately, it rarely works that way.

Welcome to the messy, nonlinear world of software engineering, where more people ≠ faster delivery — and in many cases, it can actually slow things down.


💡 Why Scaling Dev Teams Doesn’t Work Linearly

Software development isn’t factory work. You can’t just split a task into 10 equal parts and hand it out like slices of cake. Here’s why:

  • Not all tasks are parallelizable: Some steps depend on others. You can’t test a feature before it’s built. You can’t write integration code until the components exist.

  • Communication overhead increases: With more developers, more time is spent syncing, resolving merge conflicts, reviewing each other’s code, and coordinating timelines.

  • Onboarding and ramp-up time: New developers don’t start at full speed. They need context, access, onboarding, and mentorship — all of which slow the team down in the short term.

  • Context switching and meetings: As team size grows, distractions do too.


🧠 The Formula to Estimate Team Efficiency

Instead of relying on gut feeling, use a model that accounts for how work actually gets done in a dev team.

Here’s a simple but powerful formula:

Where:


📊 Real-World Example

Let’s assume:

  • A task takes 10 days for 1 developer.

  • The task is 80% parallelizable (P = 0.8) and 20% sequential (S = 0.2).

  • Coordination overhead is moderate: k = 0.1

We can now estimate the time it will take with different team sizes.

At first, adding more developers helps. But then, communication costs start dominating and you get diminishing returns — or even regressions.


🧭 How to Use This in Planning

  1. Estimate your S and P values honestly.

  • Backend systems? Higher S.

  • Independent UI components? Higher P.

  1. Model multiple team sizes before adding people.

  • Ask: “Will this extra person actually make us faster, or just more chaotic?”

  1. Look for the optimal team size.

  • There’s usually a sweet spot where the team is just big enough to benefit from parallel work but not so large that it drowns in coordination.

  1. Use k as a planning lever.

  • Reduce k by improving processes: async updates, clear task boundaries, good tooling, CI/CD, etc.


🧵 TL;DR

  • More devs help, but only to a point.

  • Coordination cost grows faster than team size.

  • Use this formula:

  • Aim for the sweet spot, not the biggest team.


💬 Final Thought

Engineering isn’t just writing code — it’s designing how code gets written. A well-structured, lean team can often outperform a bloated one.

If you’re a tech lead or PM planning your next sprint, take a moment to ask:

“Am I speeding us up… or just adding more overhead?”

Join Tushar on Peerlist!

Join amazing folks like Tushar and thousands of other people in tech.

Create Profile

Join with Tushar’s personal invite link.

2

10

0